The Deliverable Is Not the Data: Why What Happens After You Land Determines Your Reputation
- Dustin Wales
- Dec 30, 2025
- 6 min read
Updated: Jan 9

You executed a flawless flight. Your data looks clean. The weather cooperated. The client seemed happy on site.
Now what?
For most ground schools and training programs, this is where the curriculum ends. You've captured the data, job done. But in professional remote sensing work, capturing data is maybe 40% of the job. The other 60% is everything that happens between landing and the client actually using what you've given them.
This is where repeat business is built or destroyed. Not in the air. On the ground, in the processing, in the file organization, in the delivery, in the handoff, that either makes a client's life easier or makes them regret hiring you.
Let's talk about what actually matters after the flight.
The Dirty Secret of Commercial RPAS Work
Here's something experienced operators know but rarely discuss openly: a significant portion of client dissatisfaction has nothing to do with flight quality.
Clients get frustrated because:
Files are named incomprehensibly
They can't figure out which file is which
The format doesn't work with their software
They don't know what they're looking at
It takes them hours to organize what you sent
They ask a question and don't hear back for days
None of these are flying problems. They're handoff problems. And most operators don't even realize they're creating them.
File Organization: The Foundation of Professional Delivery
Let's start with something basic that almost everyone gets wrong: file naming.
When you're working on a project, your file system probably looks something like this:
DJI_0001.JPG
DJI_0002.JPG
...
DJI_0847.JPG
orthomosaic_final_v2_FINAL_actual.tif
dsm.tif
export_1.las
You know what these files are because you just made them. But three months from now, you won't remember. And your client, who's seeing these for the first time, has no idea what they're looking at.
Here's a better approach:
/2024-11-15_ClientName_SiteName/
/01_Raw_Imagery/
/Nadir/
/Oblique/
/Thermal/
/02_Processed_Data/
ClientName_SiteName_Orthomosaic_5cm.tif
ClientName_SiteName_DSM_5cm.tif
ClientName_SiteName_PointCloud.las
/03_Exports/
ClientName_SiteName_Overview.pdf
ClientName_SiteName_Report.pdf
/04_Project_Files/
[processing project files for your reference]
/05_Documentation/
Flight_Log_2024-11-15.pdf
GCP_Report.pdf
README.txt
Every file name tells you what it is without opening it. The folder structure separates raw data from processed outputs. The README explains what's included.
This takes an extra 15 minutes to set up. It saves hours of confusion for everyone involved.
Quality Control: Catching Problems Before Your Client Does
Nothing undermines professional credibility faster than delivering obviously flawed data. And "obvious" is doing a lot of work here; what's obvious to your client might not be what you were checking for.
Before any delivery, run through a basic QC checklist:
Coverage: Does the data actually cover what was requested? Open the orthomosaic. Pan to every corner. Make sure there are no gaps where the flight plan didn't quite reach or where an image failed to process.
Accuracy: If you used ground control, what's your reported error? Is it within acceptable limits for the client's use case? If you told them "survey-grade," is it actually survey-grade?
Visual quality: Any obvious stitching artifacts? Colour inconsistencies? Blurry areas? These might not matter for a measurement project, but they're embarrassing in a marketing deliverable.
File integrity: Can you actually open each file you're about to send? Does the georeferencing work? This sounds basic, but corrupt exports happen more often than anyone wants to admit.
Format compatibility: If the client told you they're using AutoCAD, did you export in a format AutoCAD can read? If they need web-compatible imagery, is the file size reasonable?
This QC pass adds maybe 30 minutes to your project. It's the cheapest insurance you can buy against a callback that says, "I can't use this."
The Delivery Package: More Than Just Files
Sending raw files with no context is like handing someone a box of puzzle pieces with no picture on the box. Sure, everything they need is technically there. But you've made their job harder instead of easier.
A professional delivery includes:
A delivery document. This can be a simple PDF or even a text file. It lists everything included, explains what each deliverable is, and provides basic guidance on how to use it. If the client is new to this kind of data, include a bit more hand-holding.
Format notes. "The orthomosaic is delivered as a GeoTIFF with embedded coordinate system [specify]. It can be opened in [common software they might use]. File size is [X GB], you may need appropriate hardware to view smoothly."
Accuracy statement. What's the reported accuracy of this data? What coordinate system is it in? This is especially important for survey-grade work where the client needs to integrate your data with other sources.
Notable observations. Did you see something interesting or concerning during capture? "We observed apparent erosion along the northeast property boundary that may warrant ground investigation." This shows you were paying attention to their site, not just flying a pattern.
Contact information. "If you have any questions about this delivery or need assistance importing the data into your systems, please contact [you]."
The Handoff Conversation
For significant deliveries, don't just dump files in a cloud folder and send a link. Schedule a brief call or meeting to walk through what you're delivering.
This is especially important for:
First-time clients who haven't received this type of data before
Complex deliverables with multiple components
Data that requires explanation or context
Projects where the client will be presenting your data to others
During the handoff:
Show them how to access and open the files
Walk through the key deliverables
Point out anything notable or relevant to their original need
Ask if they have questions
Confirm they can use the data as intended
This call might take 20 minutes. It prevents a week of back-and-forth emails and establishes you as a professional partner, not just a vendor.
Archiving: Protecting Your Work and Your Client's Investment
Your job doesn't end when the client has the files. You need to protect that data, both for your own records and for your client's future needs.
Client archives: Keep a complete copy of every delivery for at least 2-3 years. Clients often come back needing the same data they didn't realize they needed to keep. If you can deliver it again, you're a hero. If you have to tell them it's gone, you look unprofessional.
Raw data retention: For important projects, keep the raw imagery even longer. Processing technology improves; clients sometimes want data reprocessed with new software or different parameters.
Project documentation: Flight logs, GCP data, processing reports, and any correspondence about scope changes. If there's ever a question about what was delivered or why, you need to be able to reconstruct the project history.
Backup strategy: Whatever your storage solution, have a backup. Hard drives fail. Cloud services have outages. The project you can't recover is always the one someone urgently needs.
Yes, storage costs money. Consider it a business expense. The cost of losing a client's irreplaceable data, both financially and reputationally, vastly exceeds the cost of redundant storage.
Responding to Client Questions and Issues
Even with perfect delivery, clients will have questions. How you handle those questions affects whether they call you for the next project.
Respond quickly. Even if you can't solve the problem immediately, acknowledge receipt. "Got your message, let me look into this and get back to you today" is infinitely better than silence.
Don't be defensive. If there's an issue with the data, focus on solving it, not on proving it's not your fault. Even if the client is mistaken, help them understand rather than correcting them.
Document issues. If something went wrong, figure out why so it doesn't happen again. If the client's expectation didn't match reality, note that for better scope communication next time.
Follow up. After delivering data, check back in a week or two. "Were you able to use the data as intended? Any questions I can help with?" This is good customer service and often leads to additional work.
Building Systems, Not Just Flying Jobs
The operators who scale beyond a one-person hobby operation are the ones who build repeatable systems for everything that happens after the flight.
Standardized folder structures that work across all project types.
Template delivery documents that you can customize quickly.
QC checklists that ensure nothing gets missed.
Archive procedures that happen automatically, not when you remember.
Response templates for common client questions.
This isn't bureaucracy for its own sake. It'sthe infrastructure that lets you handle more projects without dropping quality. When every delivery is a custom adventure in file organization, you're working harder than you need to.
The Real Deliverable
Here's the truth that took me years to understand: the client isn't really buying data. They're buying confidence. Confidence that the data is accurate. Confidence that they can use it. Confidence that if something's wrong, you'll fix it. Confidence that if they need more work, you'll deliver again. Data is just the artifact. The real deliverable is the feeling that they made a good choice hiring you. Everything after the flight, the organization, the quality control, the documentation, the handoff, the follow-up, is what creates that feeling. It's invisible when done well. It's painfully obvious when done poorly.
The flight is what clients hire you to do. The delivery is what makes them hire you again.
Aeria Solutions is a full-spectrum remote sensing company based in Canada. We process and deliver data for clients ranging from resource-sector operators to environmental consultancies, and we've learned that professional delivery is as important as professional capture.




Comments